1. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights does not contain any provision regarding its termination and does not provide for denunciation or withdrawal. Consequently, the possibility of termination, denunciation or withdrawal must be considered in the light of applicable rules of customary international law which are reflected in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. On this basis, the Covenant is not subject to denunciation or withdrawal unless it is established that the parties intended to admit the possibility of denunciation or withdrawal or a right to do so is implied from the nature of the treaty.
2. That the parties to the Covenant did not admit the possibility of
denunciation and that it was not a mere oversight on their part to omit
reference to denunciation is demonstrated by the fact that article 41 (2)
of the Covenant does permit a State party to withdraw its acceptance of
the competence of the Committee to examine inter-State communications by
filing an appropriate notice to that effect while there is no such provision
for denunciation of or withdrawal from the Covenant itself. Moreover, the
Optional Protocol to the Covenant, negotiated and adopted contemporaneously
with it, permits States parties to denounce it. Additionally, by way of
comparison, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
which was adopted one year prior to the Covenant, expressly permits denunciation.
It can therefore be concluded that the drafters of the Covenant deliberately
intended to exclude the possibility of denunciation. The same conclusion
applies to the Second Optional Protocol in the drafting of which a denunciation
clause was deliberately omitted.
3. Furthermore, it is clear that the Covenant is not the type of treaty which, by its nature, implies a right of denunciation. Together with the simultaneously prepared and adopted International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Covenant codifies in treaty form the universal human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the three instruments together often being referred to as the "International Bill of Human Rights". As such, the Covenant does not have a temporary character typical of treaties where a right of denunciation is deemed to be admitted, notwithstanding the absence of a specific provision to that effect.
4. The rights enshrined in the Covenant belong to the people living in the territory of the State party. The Human Rights Committee has consistently taken the view, as evidenced by its long- standing practice, that once the people are accorded the protection of the rights under the Covenant, such protection devolves with territory and continues to belong to them, notwithstanding change in Government of the State party, including dismemberment in more than one State or State succession or any subsequent action of the State party designed to divest them of the rights guaranteed by the Covenant.
5. The Committee is therefore firmly of the view that international law does not permit a State which has ratified or acceded or succeeded to the Covenant to denounce it or withdraw from it.