COMMITTEE
ON THE ELIMINATION
OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
CONSIDERATION
OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES
UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION
Concluding
observations of the Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination
Tunisia
160. The ninth, tenth,
eleventh and twelfth periodic reports of Tunisia, submitted as
a single document (CERD/C/226/Add.10), were considered by the
Committee at its 1016th and 1017th meetings, on 2 March 1994 (see
CERD/C/SR.1016 and SR.1017).
161. The report was
introduced by the representative of the State party, who said
that Tunisia had ratified most of the international human rights
treaties. He reported on measures taken to strengthen protection
against discrimination, such as the prohibition on defining nationality
by racial or religious criteria, and the punishment under the
Penal Code of incitement to racial hatred and defamation on grounds
of racial or religious origin. He said that all Tunisians had
an equal right to health, social protection, work, housing and
justice.
162. The Committee
thanked the representative for the State party's report and for
the oral presentation. Members of the Committee congratulated
Tunisia on the list of human rights enunciated in the Constitution
and the fact that the Constitution recognized the primacy of duly
ratified international treaties over internal legislation. They
also expressed satisfaction at the measures taken by Tunisia to
include human rights education in schools and to teach young people
tolerance and cultural pluralism. However, they pointed out that
no country could pride itself on being free of the problem of
racial discrimination, regardless of how homogeneous the population
was. Members of the Committee wanted to know whether there were
still nomadic populations in Tunisia and, if so, whether their
culture was being preserved and to what extent they participated
in public life. They also asked whether the National Covenant,
adopted seven years before, had been accepted by all political
parties, including the opposition parties, and what place the
Covenant held in relation to the Tunisian Constitution, as well
as what its authority was in the Tunisian legal system. Members
of the Committee asked for information on the follow-up by the
Tunisian authorities to the World Meeting of National Institutions
for the Protection of Human Rights, which had been held in Tunisia.
163. With reference
to article 2 of the Convention, members of the Committee asked
what mechanisms had been set up to ensure the independence of
the human rights consultative bodies established to advise the
President of the Republic, such as the Higher Committee of Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Administrative Mediator,
and the human rights offices in the Ministries of Justice, the
Interior and Foreign Affairs. Had those bodies issued reports
on their activities and, if so, what was the content? Had the
Administrative Mediator and the offices in the various ministries
instituted judicial proceedings? They also asked whether the human
rights enunciated in the Constitution were directly applicable
by a court or whether that was possible only under special laws.
Similarly, they wanted to know whether the provisions of the Convention
could be invoked directly in court.
164. With regard to
article 4 of the Convention, the members of the Committee noted
that only press offences were mentioned in the report and not
all the other offences that should be punishable, inasmuch as
the Convention required States to declare illegal and to prohibit
organizations and propaganda activities which incited racial discrimination.
They wanted to know about the reasons for the departure of many
Jews abroad, as well as the general living conditions of Jews
in Tunisia. Which were the ethnic groups forming the 1 per cent
of the population that were not Sunni of Arab-Berber origin, and
what were their rights? What were the number and the origin of
aliens living in Tunisia and what were their rights compared with
the rights of Tunisians? Had there been cases of breaches of the
rules governing the establishment of associations or organizations,
or membership in such associations or organizations? What was
the situation of an immigrant worker who was about to complete
his labour contract for a maximum period of two years? Could the
contact be renewed? Members of the Committee also wanted to know
whether the Tunisian Government had taken steps to protect Tunisian
nationals who were victims of discrimination abroad (including
the victims of expulsion from Libya in 1985). Members of the Committee
asked about the criteria used by the Ministry of Justice to decide
whether or not a person applying for naturalization was likely
to become integrated into Tunisian society.
165. With reference
to article 5 of the Convention, members of the Committee asked
for clarification about the arrests and trials (as well as torture
and deaths in prison) in 1991 and 1992 of members of the Ennahdha
Islamist party. They also wanted to know what the practical effects
were of the prohibition of polygamy and the introduction of divorce
as the only possibility of dissolving marriage. They would like
the members of the delegation to inform the Committee of the public
rights and freedoms enjoyed and practised by immigrants and resident
aliens.
166. With regard to
article 6 of the Convention, the members of the Committee deplored
the absence of examples and statistical data on complaints, legal
proceedings and convictions for racist offence.
167. In response to
the questions and comments by the members of the Committee, the
representative of the State party said that 5,000 Tunisians were
not Muslim, including approximately 3,000 who were Jews, the remainder
being Christians. About 25,000 foreigners were working in Tunisia.
The representative went on to emphasize that there were no problems
of racial discrimination in Tunisia. In connection with the questions
about the 1987 National Covenant, he explained that the Covenant
was a text negotiated with, and signed by, all the country's political
and social forces. The text was not binding in law, but it acted
as a code that was a commitment for all the country's economic
and social forces.
168. In connection
with the questions on the Higher Committee of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms, the representative said that it was an independent
body, one third of the membership consisting of representatives
of ministerial departments and two thirds of independent individuals.
It could receive complaints from private individuals or non-governmental
organizations and could conduct inquiries and make proposals for
improvements in law and in practice. It published an annual report
on the human rights situation and, following the World Conference
on Human Rights, it had encouraged the convening of the World
Meeting of National Institutions for the Protection of Human Rights.
The role of the Administrative Mediator was to receive individuals
or non-governmental organizations concerning administrative problems
involving appeals from government agencies or public officials;
it was empowered to make proposals to the President of the Republic.
As to the status of international treaties in national law, in
civil proceedings treaties could be invoked by the party concerned,
whereas in criminal proceedings it was for the prosecutor to refer
to the relevant conventions, which were binding and took precedence
over Tunisian law.
169. Concerning the
Berbers in Tunisia, the representative of the State party said
that they were particularly well integrated into Tunisian society
and had no grievances; he also said that there were no nomadic
tribes in Tunisia. In connection with the questions about the
Jews in Tunisia, the representative said that their departure
to France (most had a French passport) could be explained partly
by the collectivization and socialization policy of the 1960s,
a policy that had applied to all Tunisians and was not discriminatory
but had induced many Jews engaged in commerce to leave, and partly
by events in the Middle East from 1967 which had created tensions
in the region, causing many Jews to leave. There had been no Government
aim to secure the departure of Jews from Tunisia. Most immigrants
in Tunisia were Moroccans or Algerians, together with some Europeans
employed by foreign companies. Tunisia had ratified the ILO conventions
concerning equality of treatment of nationals and non-nationals
in employment and occupations and equal remuneration and social
security.
Concluding observations
170. At its 1034th
meeting, on 15 March 1994, the Committee adopted the following
concluding observations.
(a) Introduction
171. Appreciation
is expressed to the State party for the detailed information contained
in its report and the supplementary information provided by the
State party representative.
(b) Positive aspects
172. The democratic
changes that have taken place in the State party during the reporting
period are welcomed and satisfaction is expressed concerning the
various measures taken to promulgate legislation and create mechanisms
for the implementation of its international human rights treaty
obligations. It is also noted with appreciation that various human
rights institutions and non-governmental organizations have been
established in the State party.
173. It is noted with
satisfaction that the Constitution recognizes the principle of
the primacy of international law and that the provisions of the
Convention are directly applicable. The various measures taken
in order to promote through education and teaching the principles
of tolerance and respect for fundamental rights in conformity
with article 7 of the Convention are also welcomed.
(c) Principal subjects
of concern
174. It is noted,
however, that the report did not provide concrete information
on the implementation of the Convention in practice and did not
therefore fully comply with the State party's obligations under
article 9 of the Convention. Regret is expressed over the absence
of concrete information and statistical data in the report on
the effective functioning of the recently established human rights
bodies and mechanisms. While appreciation is expressed for the
detailed information contained in the report, more focused data
on the actual application of the Convention is required.
175. Concern is expressed
that specific legislative and other measures to prevent and prohibit
racial discrimination have not been adopted by the State party.
It is noted that domestic legislation lacks provisions to implement
fully article 4 of the Convention, in particular, provision declaring
punishable by law all acts of racist violence, the incitement
to such acts and the provision of assistance to racist activities,
as well as the prohibition of organizations, activities and propaganda
which promote and incite racial discrimination. It is stressed
that the existing provisions of the Penal Code do not fully comply
with the requirements of that article.
176. Concern is also
expressed that the provisions of Organic Law No. 92-25 could be
interpreted and applied in contradiction to the requirements of
article (d) 5 (ix) of the Convention concerning the right to freedom
of peaceful assembly and association.
(d) Suggestions and recommendations
177. The Committee
recommends that specific legislation be introduced to implement
the provisions of article 4 of the Convention, taking into account
general recommendation XV (42) of the Committee.
178. The Committee
recommends that the next report of the State party should include
information and statistical data about measures taken to implement
the rights enshrined in the Convention and to guarantee effective
remedies to possible victims of racial discrimination.
179. The Committee
suggests that the State party consider making the declaration
under article 14, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
180. The Committee
draws the attention of the State party to the amendment to article
8, paragraph 6, of the Convention, which was approved by the fifteenth
meeting of States parties and by the General Assembly in its resolution
47/111, and encourages the State party to expedite its action
formally to accept that amendment.